Baseline
Structured health and functional-fitness assessment plus agreed workforce and productivity indicators.
You measure output.
You measure efficiency.
You measure machines, systems and processes.
A 90-day applied research and organisational benchmarking initiative examining the relationship between workforce health, functional fitness and enterprise productivity.
National and sector benchmarks are being established through participating organisations. Early participants help define the evidence base.
The programme is designed to establish a disciplined baseline for the human capability behind organisational performance—without reducing people to a single productivity score.
Know your number. Know where you stand. Know what to improve.
A repeatable pathway designed for enterprise research, workforce insight and longitudinal learning.
Structured health and functional-fitness assessment plus agreed workforce and productivity indicators.
Aggregate organisational patterns and relationships are analysed without turning individual health data into performance ratings.
A defined observation and follow-up period creates a stronger evidence base than a one-day wellness camp.
Follow-up measurement captures change over time using the same framework.
The organisation receives a confidential management view; peer benchmarks are added only when sufficient comparable data exist.
Health and functional fitness are measured as workforce characteristics. Productivity-related indicators are analysed separately to examine relationships.
Selected non-invasive health-related indicators designed for population-level research and workforce insight.
Practical measures of balance, mobility, endurance, coordination and other relevant functional capabilities.
Agreed organisational indicators are analysed separately to study relationships with workforce health and functional fitness.
The initiative is being developed around doctoral research through the Mumbai School of Economics and Public Policy, University of Mumbai. Corporate participation, data use and reporting should operate under the applicable research, consent and data-governance protocol.
View Industry Participation LetterPrivate individual scorecard
De-identified analysis dataset
Aggregated management insights
Participation should be voluntary and based on informed consent. Individual results are intended for the participant; organisational reporting is designed around aggregated patterns rather than employee ranking.
This is not a diagnostic or a quote. It is a fast planning check to identify whether a 90-day cohort can be scoped efficiently.
No. The programme is designed to study workforce health, functional fitness and their relationship with productivity at an aggregate organisational level. It is not intended to label individual employees as productive or unproductive.
The programme is designed so participating employees receive their own individual results, while organisations receive appropriately aggregated insights. Final data-access rules will follow the approved research and data-governance protocol.
No. The programme is an academic applied-research and organisational benchmarking initiative. Industry participation has been encouraged through a letter from the office of the Hon'ble Minister for Industries, Government of Maharashtra.
Yes. A single site, function, shift group or other suitable cohort can be used to establish the organisation's baseline before wider participation.
No. National and sector benchmarks will only be published or used when sufficient comparable data have been collected. Early participants help establish the evidence base.